By default, identity tags are kept private, so that they aren't exported with images.
Adobe lightroom 6 vs cc software#
These identity tags can also be applied to images where the software hasn't recognized a face. The Face Detection tool allows you to tag people in images, and will then attempt to identify those people in other photos. This brush tool should help address exactly that, by allowing you to directly edit, say, a gradient you've applied, as shown below:Ī new Filter Brush tool enables direct editing of gradient and radial filters. Previously, while these filters were very flexible indeed, they suffered from an inability for finer control through masks. The new versions also bring a Filter Brush tool that allows for regions of gradient and radial filters to be painted out or in, to allow filters to be better matched to the image they're being applied to. A simple averaging feature with Raw output would be very much welcome, and though it's possible that HDR Merge may sort-of enable this, we'd love to see direct support of it from Adobe. This requires a somewhat laborious layering process in Photoshop and, furthermore, requires 'flattening' of the file and therefore limited flexibility in further post-processing. Many newer wide angle lenses don't allow for the use of filters because of their large front elements. One way to simulate a longer exposure is to take a number of shorter exposures and average them together, as we have in the example above (roll-over the bottom right cell to see the original, shorter exposure). There's yet another advantage to image averaging: it allows you to simulate the effects of neutral density filters. One of the 1/15s shots that was averaged with 10 others to simulate a longer exposure. As far as we understand, though, simple image averaging isn't supported, though you can get close in Photoshop's HDR Merge by ensuring 'remove ghosts' is unchecked.ġ1 shots, 1/15s each, averaged in Photoshop to simulate a nearly 1s exposure. Falls Creek Falls in Carson, WA.
![adobe lightroom 6 vs cc adobe lightroom 6 vs cc](https://s3.cloud.cmctelecom.vn/tinhte1/2017/10/4156041_lightroom_cc_vs_lightroom_classic_tinhte.vn.png)
Averaging a number of these images can clean up these shadows for further brightening, and avoids some of the local artifacts that can occur when merging drastically different exposures traditionally using HDR software. For example, an image that's exposed for the highlights will typically have a lot of detail in the shadows, which are inherently noisy. Image averaging opens up a number of possibilities, including lowering noise in images, which can also help extend dynamic range. The merging options and their ability to output essentially a Raw file is particularly interesting for post-processing applications we routinely engage in, and here we wish Adobe went a bit further and allowed for simple image averaging with Raw DNG output.
Adobe lightroom 6 vs cc full#
In other words, the resulting DNG should retain most of the full editing capabilities each individual Raw file would've had before the HDR or panorama merge. Importantly, the HDR results are saved as 16-bit floating-point DNGs, to maximize subsequent processing flexibility. New to Lightroom are these very HDR and Panorama merge options (including the ability to create HDR Panoramas), each offering just a couple of options but promising to do all the complex exposure and white balance matching in the background. Previously, HDR merges and panorama creation would require round-tripping to Photoshop (or other 3rd party tools) and, even worse, would necessitate 'flattening' to a TIFF or PSD file, which locks in certain adjustments typically available to Raw files. What's more, the output is a 16-bit DNG file, which retains most of the flexibility of the original Raw. HDR Merge, which previously required a round-trip to Adobe Photoshop, is now natively supported in Lightroom. As per the company's announcement earlier this year, the latest versions require 64-bit operating systems. The latest versions of the software make greater use of computers' graphics processors (GPUs), speeding up most processes and allowing complex tasks to run in the background without slowing the user experience. The CC version also works with Voice and Slate: two new programs for creating image-based animations and presentations.
Adobe lightroom 6 vs cc android#
The CC version of the software is also designed to tie-in with the iOS and Android versions of Lightroom, by allowing for collections you choose to be synced and available across multiple devices, as well as on a web platform. Face Recognition tools have also been added, to simplify the tagging and retrieval of images.
![adobe lightroom 6 vs cc adobe lightroom 6 vs cc](https://seolalen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/lightroom-cc-6.0.jpg)
Also added is the ability to paint-out regions of gradient filters, to allow more flexible overlays.
![adobe lightroom 6 vs cc adobe lightroom 6 vs cc](https://prodesigntools.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/adobe-lightroom-6-splash-screenshot.jpg)
The latest versions gain simple HDR and Panorama merging tools that create DNG files from the merged results (16-bit floating point DNGs in the case of the HDR mode). Panorama merge, a feature offered in Lightroom CC and Lightroom 6.Īdobe has announced new standalone and Creative Cloud versions of its image management and Raw conversion software, Lightroom.